NetEZ.com NetEZ Community
Enter City & State or US Zip Code:
Change your local weather options
Google
WWW NetEZ.com

NetEZ.com Forum Index  
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

blog: battle of the file managers

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NetEZ.com Forum Index -> xplorer˛ Professional
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nikos
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002
Posts: 12346
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:37 am    Post subject: blog: battle of the file managers Reply with quote

here's the comment area for today's blog article
www.zabkat.com/blog/27May07.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
RickyF
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Location: CT, USA

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 12:11 pm    Post subject: Was there any doubt which was the best? Reply with quote

I expected these results  Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nikos
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002
Posts: 12346
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

obviously i have a vested interest here but i assure you the results and tests are 100% genuine. All the compared programs are out there for everybody to reproduce the tests. This is exact science Smile

if you can think of more objective tests just name them and i'll have a round #2 of the battle next week
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
fgagnon
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 4271
Location: Springfield

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No surprises for me, either. Wink

But I have a suggestion regarding the presentation of the Who gets it done fastest table...
Instead of hiding the reason for TC's "win" at the end of the second paragraph below the table, there should two rows added to the table indication the accuracy rate for each search for "pipa"
I will bet that most folks will just look at the table and not read the following words in full.
Quote:
That is because TC can't find text in PDF and office  documents like xplorer˛ (and opus) can. So it's a empty victory, mere tomfoolery.

... or ...
Also show speed data without there being office docs or pdf's in the search range.  That would be a better comparison to TC for the limited set of file types that it does support.

... or ...  
simply give TC a FAIL grade and not a time because, it never finds all the files containing "pipa"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nikos
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002
Posts: 12346
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i'm sure there's going to be some plugin for TC to extend its functionality for office & PDF, these guys have plugins for everything. Then we can see how fast it is in equal terms
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ckit
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 232
Location: QLD Australia

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congratulations, Nikos!
xplorer2 pro seems to fare really well against others Smile
_________________
xplorer˛ pro 1.8.0.12 x64 on Win7 Pro x64
AnVir Task Manager Pro, Avira Premium, Executor, Glary Utilities Pro, Process Lasso Pro, WinRAR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Gandolf
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 307

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you seen this Nikos? It's in the Help file for AcuteFinder.

Recommended tools

Through the years, we have grown accustomed to various tools for file and disk management, many of which function very well with AcuteFinder.  Some of them are listed below, along with a short description. All those tools are highly recommended and worth their asking price many times over.

· WinZip for handling of file archives, like ZIP-files.  Undoubtedly, the best of the breed in this category.
· ExamDiff from PrestoSoft to compare folders and files
· Hex Workshop from BreakPoint software for viewing and editing files in hex mode
· UltraEdit-32 from IDM Computer Solutions for editing of text documents
· IrfanView by Irfan Skiljan for viewing of image files
· Xplorer2 from Zabkat.com for folder comparison, super file finder and a lot more
· Diskeeper and Undelete from Diskeeper Corporation software, to defragment disks and to recover deleted files
· Norton Utilities and Norton AntiVirus from Symantec
· F-prot virus scanner from FRISK Software International

On our website, www.acutefinder.com, you will find a more details about these programs, and other programs that we recommend to all serious PC users.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WimdeLange
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 302
Location: NL

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about a test where a directory is read which contains a big number of files (say 50.000 or more).

Interesting facts, time to read it, memory usage after reading, sorting on other criteria. And include windows itself (in the reading and sorting).

On our network we have some rather large directories and I'm always wondering what is the best tool to manipulate them. I'm using xplorer2 (what else), but the waiting takes sometimes a lot of time (time to get coffee.....).
_________________
Groetjes,
  Wim de Lange
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
nikos
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002
Posts: 12346
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, we can have a round 2 with more stats -- although i don't have a folder with 50000 items! Have you tried windows explorer in those network folders, is it faster than x2? Also make sure you aren't sorting on a "slow" column
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
WimdeLange
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 302
Location: NL

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nikos wrote:
ok, we can have a round 2 with more stats -- although i don't have a folder with 50000 items! Have you tried windows explorer in those network folders, is it faster than x2? Also make sure you aren't sorting on a "slow" column
I'll try when I'm back on the network for some timings.  What is considered a slow column? I'll try several. Later more.
_________________
Groetjes,
  Wim de Lange
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
nikos
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002
Posts: 12346
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

slow i guess is whatever you find slow during use! Usually the explorer (non-stock) columns are slow, the furhter down you go the worse
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NetEZ.com Forum Index -> xplorer˛ Professional All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP