| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
syyhpf New Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:36 am Post subject: How can i copy a folder's path? |
|
|
I know i can use Alt+C shortcut cmd to copy a file's full name to clipboard, include file's path and file's name. For example, D:\Program Files\test.txt .
But how can I copy only the folder's path to clipboard,for example,i only want "D:\Program Files\" to clipboard.
Is thers any shortcut key? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikos Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 12397 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
jump into the addressbar and press ctrl+C  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syyhpf New Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nikos wrote: | jump into the addressbar and press ctrl+C  |
It seems not the best way!
Any cmd script can do this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BRX Gold Member

Joined: 08 Feb 2002 Posts: 480
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
You also could go the dir up with backspace and use alt-C on the folder. That's what I do mostly. I don't think this is so inconvenient and warrants another function or button.
But you could also install the shell extension Ninotech Path Copy (google for link) or something similar. I used this before Nikos introduced the alt-C functionality.
I think the shell extension allowed copy the folder path alone from the selected file. Still you need right-click to access this and I personally think Nikos and my way are more convenient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert2 Silver Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
The home of Ninotech Path Copy is http://home.worldonline.dk/ninotech/freeutil.htm#pathcopy
It has a "Long Folder" command that places the parent folder name onto the Windows clipboard.
Note that right-clicking can be done without taking your hands off the keyboard. Use the special Menu key.
Cheers,
Robert |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syyhpf New Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks very much for your answers.
But what does "right-clicking can be done without taking your hands off the keyboard", how can i do that without taking my hands off the keyboard?
I must use the mouse to do right-click action.
And what does "Use the special Menu key" mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikos Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 12397 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| that's the context menu key on your keyboard that simulates right click |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hb New Member

Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The Application key has an image of a mouse pointer on a menu (between the Alt and Ctrl keys to the right of your Space Bar). Depressing this key will display the selected item's shortcut window. This is the menu that is displayed by right-clicking. |
| Code: | | http://www.seoconsultants.com/windows/keyboard/ |
Oops, Nikos beat me to it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syyhpf New Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks very much, i got it!
It's so amazing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BRX Gold Member

Joined: 08 Feb 2002 Posts: 480
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Still,
Shift-Tab, ctrl-C, Tab: 3 keystrokes (Nikos' way)
Backspace, alt-C, Enter: 3 keystrokes (my way)
2 keystrokes only if you don't need to return back to the file
Pathcopy:
Menu-key, several navigation with arrows to reach submenu of pathcopy, Enter: several keystrokes more maybe with the need to pay attention to the navigation in the context menu
I just don't see the point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikos Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 12397 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
somewhere i read about the "lazy-clever" personality type, we have a lot of those around here  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert2 Silver Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
First, note that the “Path Copy” commands can be set up so that they appear as main items in the right-click context menu.
I personally use the mouse most of the time to select file(s) or folder(s), followed by either
—a left click on any of the Path Copy commands,
or
—“Ctrl+P” or “Alt+C” (the xplorer² native keyboard shortcuts),
depending on my mood, and availability or appropriateness of commands.
To be honest, I never saw the point of bending over backwards to avoid using the mouse. Especially, when dealing with file management.
This is to avoid being labelled as “lazy-clever” or “too clever by half” around here.
Cheers,
Robert |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikos Moderator


Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 12397 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nothing wrong with being lazy-clever, i am guilty as charged! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cosmo Gold Member

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 408
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BRX wrote: | Shift-Tab, ctrl-C, Tab: 3 keystrokes (Nikos' way)
Backspace, alt-C, Enter: 3 keystrokes (my way)
|
Pitifully this (the 2nd row) is not always right.
In case, that you have been in the parent folder in the same x2-session, going to it (another time in this session) will set the focus to the previously marked object, not to the child folder, where you came from. So - depending from the content of the parent folder - you have to press some more.
I asked for a change some time ago and I take the chance to ask once more: I want this behavior in the case, that an folder is entered by the backspace-key, changed in the way (BRX obviously also found to be logical), that the just left child folder is marked and in this case not the previously marked item.
Using the backspace-way gives a chance of very far more than 50%, that you want to do something with this object (e.g. pathname copying), and the rest of the chances distribute to all other objects in this folder, that you want to do anything with the object, that has been marked in the previous visit (which you probably do not even remember any more). So in this case the behavior is IMO wrong, at least annoying. Nikos, in case you still disagree, make it an option please. (Just to prevent misunderstandings: In all cases you go back to an earlier visited folder by another way than backspace (= double clicking on an empty area and so on) this remembrance of the previously marked item is fine.)
EDIT:
To bring it to the point: The actual behavior is not only annoying, but potentially dangerous: If you go via backspace to a parent folder after having inspected the questioned sub folder and press del or copy it to a stick (for another person) or or or ..., and you do not notice beforehand, that the wrong folder has been focused, the result may be a disaster!. This is because the behavior of x2 is not really consistent (in this context) and by the human user (who has other things to do than to remember, which folder he has visited in a given x2-session) not predictable. If not being in the parent folder before the just left sub folder is marked, but if you have been in the parent folder before, .... Behaving differently in different situations can be good productivity helper, but it also can be incalculable risk; this is a typical case for the latter case. Software design should allow those potentially risky situations only in very rare exceptional situations - or as said as an option (for those who love the danger and hate backups ). _________________ Thomas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syyhpf New Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BRX wrote: | Still,
Shift-Tab, ctrl-C, Tab: 3 keystrokes (Nikos' way)
Backspace, alt-C, Enter: 3 keystrokes (my way)
|
two methods are both convenient.
But I prefer the 1st more,because i can finish the task with my left hand only.
1. Shift+Tab
2. Ctrl+C
3. Alt+Tab,shift to the place where i nedd the folder path
4. Ctrl+V. Ok,finished.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|